User:Rogerhc

From Wikitravel

Roger :-)

In <see, do, eat, etc. > tags, use an alt="" attribute for translation of the item name.

Wikitravel:Romanization#Chinese

  • Some Name(小中国Xiao Zhongguo),83 Some Road, Some District, Some City,00-000-000-000.Description goes here.¥100.  edit

[edit]Contact

roger at rogerchrisman dot com

Roger Chrisman (650) 387-4732 Palo Alto, California

[edit]Projects

Wikigogy.org— to pick up for English teachers where Wikitravel and Wikipedia let off.

[edit]IB stuff

[edit]Roger's Wikitravel bookmarks

[edit]Roger's work space

[edit]Map

[edit]Copyright law leads and references

[edit]Copyrights discussed

[edit]International Copyright law references

  • Universal Copyright Conventionas revised at Paris on 24 July 1971:
Per sectionhttp://www.unesco.org/culture/laws/copyright/html_eng/page1.shtml
Whole thing on one pagehttp://palimpsest.stanford.edu/bytopic/intprop/pariscnv.html

[edit]USA Copyright law references

[edit]Fair Use (part of US copyright law)

"Fair use" forbids damaging the original work's sales in the marketplace. So we need to label clearly any stuff we have on the site that is here by virtue of fair use and thus cannot be used commercially in a way that would damage the original work's sales in the marketplace. Wikipedia has this problem, too.

Just because US law says we can does not mean we need to choose to do this.Wikitravel:Copyright detailssets out the standard for Wikitravel. It says fair use is not appropriate for Wikitravel. Because Wikitravel uses a different copyright licence what may be acceptable for Wikipedia may not be suitable for Wikitravel. --Huttite21:02, 29 Dec 2005 (EST)
Having looked at theFair Usesection, (Section 107), it state thatFair Useis permittedfor purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching ... , scholarship, or research. Travel is not on the list. While Wikipedia may be considered a work ofscholarship or research, because of the standards they set about researching articles, it ishighlyunlikely that Wikitravel could claim the same thing. It is difficult to see what of the aboveFair Usecriteria articles written for Wikitravel would even fall under - even news reporting is a bit too much of a stretch. It seems to me that theFair Useprovision exists to allow somebody to comment or respond to what somebody else has said, either to contrast or support an agument or as evidence in an opinion piece. This is not the main intent of Wikitravel. Consequently, I cannot see how the provisions ofFair Usewould apply to Wikitravel content - it might to talk pages and how I used it here is a classic example ofFair Use; including criticism, comment, and teaching. Unless you use copyrighted works in a similar way it is notFair Use. --Huttite05:00, 31 Dec 2005 (EST)

[edit]Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)

US Title 17, section 102

The Copyright Law of the United States of America and Related Laws Contained in Title 17 of the United States Code, section 102, says:

..(b) In no case does copyright protection for an original work of authorship extend to any idea, procedure, process, system, method of operation, concept, principle, or discovery, regardless of the form in which it is described, explained, illustrated, or embodied in such work.
(http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#102)

Recently Planned Trips

HOSTEL VILLA MICHELLE IN PANAMA by HOSTEL VILLA MICHELLE
9/12/2010
     
Milan Holidays! by citybreak1
6/3/2010
     
Interrail2010 by adanielssr
7/24/2010
     
Interrail2010 by adanielssr
7/24/2010
     
VietMAS by jaime_frias
12/9/2010
     

Plan a trip View all trips

Most Popular Books: